Mead George Herbart, a theorist in his book Mind Self and Society, describes a communication system as a cycle of gestures or meaningful symbols that culminate in communication involving more than one person. The first party makes a gesture and receives a response from the second party. Depending on the response, the initiator of the gesture responds and this cycle continues. Communication through gestures can be done either consciously or unconsciously. In the first case, the communication goes from an insignificant gesture to a very important gesture that leads to a calculated movement that is understood by both parties. On the other hand, in the latter, an individual can unconsciously make a gesture and others can respond, but because the initiator is not aware of his gesture and that it creates a situation requiring a response, the communication breaks down and the person cannot. respond accordingly. This is expected to lead to communication through meaningful symbols such as vocal gestures or the use of words. It is assumed that the maker of vocal gestures acts on the responses perceived from the original gesture.
Mead George Herbart, a theorist in his book Mind Self and Society, describes a communication system as a cycle of gestures or meaningful symbols that culminate in communication involving more than one person. The first party makes a gesture and receives a response from the second party. Depending on the response, the initiator of the gesture responds and this cycle continues. Communication through gestures can be done either consciously or unconsciously. In the first case, the communication goes from an insignificant gesture to a very important gesture that leads to a calculated movement that is understood by both parties. On the other hand, in the latter, an individual can unconsciously make a gesture and others can respond, but because the initiator is not aware of his gesture and that it creates a situation requiring a response, the communication breaks down and the person cannot. respond accordingly. This is expected to lead to communication through meaningful symbols such as vocal gestures or the use of words. It is assumed that the maker of vocal gestures acts on the responses perceived from the original gesture.
Man is a social organism, whose gesture is called a social action and it concerns two or more individuals. It is a social object that has a collective meaning for all acting organisms because they have a collective understanding of the object. In this environment, there is a common understanding of a social object whose meaning ranges from simple activities such as football, to more complex activities such as formal ceremonies such as scaling, to very complex activities such as air travel. It is determined by an intelligence organization that makes it easier to understand and respond to an important symbol. Between the communicating parties, it takes on a special meaning. From this comes social order or the ability to understand gestures and respond to their demands. Since all objects are comprehensible, all people are expected to respond in a well-coordinated manner. It creates understanding and harmony in life.
It is assumed that all gestures are universal and thus all meanings are the same. They are also expected to maintain clarity so that gestures are interpreted without problems. It is also assumed that all gestures are responded to impromptu.
Conceptualizing the use of gestures, it is assumed that this mode ensures smooth communication through gestures, but probably it will have obstacles because not everyone interprets gestures in the same way, a gesture can mean something different to different people in different environments. or socializations, it leads to message distortion, confusion and communication breakdown.
Lovely Man Paul explores body tattooing and body piercing, which he describes as a theory of identity. He claims that it is a body project where individuals are represented through tattoos and piercings. The design and actual bodily pain associated with writings is part of the self-identity associated with this process. There are those whose tattoos have deep meaning in areas such as religion or culture, which is a source of pride. The origin of these trends can be traced back to celebrities and pop stars who initiated a special design, gaining popularity and widespread application that is slowly evolving into a subculture.
This process is a calculated way because a decision must be made about the type of tattoo and how it should be done. There is also a deep-rooted attachment to it, as care and maintenance must be taken during the tattooing process. A find This is a time of deep connection with the tattoo and a special bond is formed, so whatever it means, it will be greatly appreciated by the wearer. Despite the permanence of the mark, it does not mean the duration of the “belief” in the meaning of the tattoo, many have tattoos and piercings, but it does not reflect the current style and lifestyle. This means that tattoos can act as preservers of history, as in some cases they reflect a passage or cultural achievement.
There is a lot of stigma attached to tattoos, mainly because in the early years they were associated with criminal gangs and prisoners, violence and general deviant behavior. In this background, the subject of acceptance in society continues to be important, because it continues to be treated with respect and great respect, it becomes a source of stigma for the bearer of society. Tattoos always have a profound effect beyond the period when the writings are necessary or indispensable because they are permanent. It leaves you trapped in a past that cannot be erased.
Both theories are deeply rooted in the mind, in communication the origin is the same as the idea of tattooing or piercing. The first is interactive, while the second follows an individual approach. Their purpose is similar, they both convey the feelings of a person, but they differ greatly in terms of durability, because tattoos inevitably age after a while, while gestures are here to stay. Individually oriented activity, which is self-directed activity, has a fine line, while social group-oriented activity is mainly influenced by peers or role models. People are objects to other people before they become objects to themselves. This is achieved by having perspective on other people’s lifestyles and sometimes living in their image, letting them influence your own. In many cases, people’s actions are copied by other people.
